Evaluations vs. Coaching

 


Every district and every site has evaluations for both certificated and classified staff members. But what about preparing these staff members for these staff members? How are we ensuring that these employees are set up for success? This is where coaching comes into play, and where I might argue is essential to the success of a school. In order to understand the importance of both we must understand the difference along with the importance of each.




What is the Difference between Evaluating and Coaching?


            The difference between a coach and an evaluator in the field of education is simple. Coaches are there for support and growth while an evaluator’s purpose is to calculate and score an employee based on their performance. “The role of the mentor (coach) is to advocate, support, and coach teachers as they learn and acquire new instructional strategies for effective teaching” says “Coaching with a Focus, whereas an evaluator is to provide a score based off performance. This just means that a coaching observation’s purpose is to watch a teacher and  assist in improvement. Coaches do this through “providing advice [and] encourages the mentee teacher through reflective questions to look at his/her own resources to determine planning and problem-solving solutions. "An evaluator does not need to participate in the improvement aspect. They provide the score, and then it is up to the employee to seek how to improve.


Why are Evaluations and Coaching BOTH Important?


Most understand that an evaluation process is vital to understanding how employees are performing, and when it comes to a school setting, to see if student’s are being taught and furthermore understand and engage in how they are being taught. Without an evaluation, there would be no accountability for the standards and furthermore, future of our students.

IF evaluations are so imperative, then why would we deem coaching equally as vital to the education system? The importance of coaching is to assist staff members who are improving their practice. Without instructional coaches, staff members do not have the opportunity for feedback and practice to prepare or succeed during the evaluations. Fletcher (2012) mentions that the GROW model is applicable to coaching and its research: 

-Goal setting 

-Reality Check 

-Options available 

-Wrap up 

While this acronym was created for business, it related to the classroom too. Students have goals with realistic expectations through the options made available by their teachers. All of this results in the “wrap up” which would be their learning or the product they have created. This of course would be done through the teacher coaching them through the realistic goals (the standards) by giving choice while teaching and collecting an assessment at the end to see if those goals were obtained. Observing student work and giving student feedback are crucial for improvements to be made in order to reach that goal. Dr. Vandenberg mentions that teaching and learning do not always go hand in hand, but it is important that the educator is facilitating the learning (p. 2). By following this acronym, the educator is doing all they can to ensure that the student has the opportunity to learn what we want to teach them (p, 2). Similarly, mentoring teachers can be used with the same approach. The teacher can set goals based on standard or on CSTP’s. The teacher should assure these are reasonable and attainable. Any improvement is progress. A mentor can assist in all of these steps, such as creating options for the teacher to obtain their goal before that end product. They can also observe the teacher and give feedback for the teacher to improve toward the standards or goals. 

This, the idea of coaching/ goal setting, and observing ad offering feedback to help reach those goals not only assists in student achievement regarding the standards, but in the capacity of a teacher's strengths regarding the teaching of those standards. 


References: 


Coaching with a Focus. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gGVgrXXJSkpj5Ix_3q0FDevzN_mF_SvS/view 


Fletcher, S. J., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/sage-handbook-of-mentoring-and-coaching-in-education/book235773


Vandenberg, L. (n.d.). Facilitating Adult Learning. Retrieved from https://www.canr.msu.edu/od/uploads/files/PD/Facilitating_Adult_Learning.pdf


Comments